Rhetorical Agency: An Attribution Based on Trust

Authors

  • Elisabeth Hoff-Clausen Aarhus University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52610/rhs.v14i54.161

Keywords:

rhetorical agency, trust, pistis, crisis of trust

Abstract

Trust is not just a result of rhetorical action but a precondition for it. While perhaps obvious, this is seldom made explicit in rhetorical theory. In this paper, therefore, I examine the relations between trust and rhetorical agency and argue that attributions of rhetorical agency are based on trust in others, in oneself and in the systems and institutions we share with those with whom we interact. This exacer bates rhetorical challenges during crises of trust. In situations where the warranty of trust is questioned we tend to safeguard ourselves sooner than reach out to one another. This affects the performance, meaning and force of the rhetorical utterances we make.

Author Biography

Elisabeth Hoff-Clausen, Aarhus University

Elisabeth Hoff-Clausen er post.doc., ph.d. i retorik, ved Center for virksomhedskommunikation, ASB, Aarhus Universitet

References

Bok, Sissela. Lying. Moral choice in public and private life. Hassocks: Harvester Press, 1978. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1288137

Fafner, Jørgen. “Retorikkens brændpunkt”. Rhetorica Scandinavica 2 (1997): 7-19. Oprindelig udgivet i Vad är retorik? Red. Berge. Stockholms Universitet, 1988. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52610/SXJJ2879

Fukuyama, Francis. Trust. The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. London: Hamish Hamilton, 2005.

Geisler, Cheryl. “Teaching the Post-Modern Rhetor. Continuing the Conversation on Rhetorical Agency”. RSQ 35, 4 (2005): 107-113 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02773940509391324

Goodwin, Jean. “Small Rhetorical Citizenship for a Big World”. Forelæsning holdt ved seminar om retorisk medborgerskab, 6/6 2008, Københavns Universitet, Danmark.

Goodwin, Jean. ”Cicero’s Authority”. Philosophy and Rhetoric 34, 1 (2001): 38-60 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/par.2001.0003

Govier, Trudy. Social Trust and Human Communities. Montreal & Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780773566828

Govier, Trudy. Dilemmas of Trust. Montreal & Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780773567511

Govier, Trudy. Taking Wrongs Seriously. Acknowledgement, Reconciliation, and the Politics of Sustainable Peace. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books, 2006.

Gunn, Joshua og Dana L. Cloud. “Agentic Orientation as Magical Voluntarism”. Communication Theory 20 (2010): 50-78 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2009.01349.x

Hauser, Gerard A. og Chantal Benoit-Barne. “Reflections on Rhetoric, Deliberative Democracy, Civil Society, and Trust”. Rhetoric & Public Affairs 5, 2 (2002): 261-275 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/rap.2002.0029

Hoff-Clausen, Elisabeth, Christine Isager og Lisa S. Villadsen. “Retorisk agency – hvad skaber retorikken?”. Rhetorica Scandinavica 33 (2005): 56-65 DOI: https://doi.org/10.52610/HRGA7785

Hoff-Clausen, Elisabeth. ”Pas på sproget: Tillid og tale i nye offentlige rum”. I: Tillid fra vikingerne til den virtuelle verden: Teorier og case studier. Red. Svendsen & Hegedahl. Odense: Syddansk Universitetsforlag, under udgivelse.

Inglehart, Ronald. “Trust, Well-Being and Democracy”. I: Democracy and trust. Red. Warren, 88-120. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511659959.004

Lewis, J. David og Andrew Weigert. “Trust as a Social Reality”. I: Social Forces, 63 (1985): 967-985 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2578601

Luhmann, Niklas. Tillid – en mekanisme til reduktion af social kompleksitet. Oversat af Nils Mortensen. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag, 1999.

Lundberg, Christian og Joshua Gunn. ”Ouija Board, Are There Any Communications?’ Agency, Ontotheology, and the Death of the Humanist Subject, or, Continuing the ARS Conversation”, RSQ 35, 4 (2005): 83-106 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02773940509391323

Løgstrup, K. E. Den etiske fordring (1956), 2. udgave. København: Gyldendal, 1991.

Marback, Richard. “A Meditation on Vulnerability in Rhetoric”, Rhetoric Review 29, 1 (2010): 1-13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07350190903415149

Miller, Carolyn R. “What Can Automation Tell Us about Agency?”, RSQ 37, 2 (2007): 137-157 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02773940601021197

Offe, Claus. “How Can We Trust Our Fellow Citizens?”. I: Democracy and Trust. Red. Warren, 42-87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1999). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511659959.003

Putnam, Robert D. Bowling Alone. The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/358916.361990

Svendsen, Gert T. og Gunnar L. H. Svendsen. Social kapital. En introduktion. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag, 2006.

Villadsen, Lisa S. “Speaking on Behalf of Others: Rhetorical Agency and Epideictic Functions in Official Apologies”, RSQ 38, 1 (2008): 25-45 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02773940701779769

Downloads

Published

2025-12-16

How to Cite

Hoff-Clausen, E. (2025). Rhetorical Agency: An Attribution Based on Trust. Rhetorica Scandinavica, 14(54), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.52610/rhs.v14i54.161